Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution
My first reaction to "health nut"s in general is one of ridicule. Much of the vegan/vegetarian movement is complete bunk, and the crusade against fat in food is founded on a basis of flawed data interpretation and self-righteous asshattery. While I could write, and have written, reams on the misinterpretation of Ancel Keys' China Study data, this isn't really a health science blog, so those interested in more rantage in that direction can contact me in private.
The reason I mention this is that recently, a show called Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution became available again on hulu. While I have some qualms with Jamie Oliver and the approach to his show, I feel like it's at least worth a mention on the blog, as it addresses the sad state of food in America. And what a sad state it is--so sad, in fact, that some of my European friends have told me that a good portion of Europe thinks the state of food in America is an urban legend due to how ridiculous it sounds. Personally, I agree--just the descriptions of public school food in America evoke a very Orwell (or at least Vonnegut)-esque feeling, and I would be skeptic about them as well, if I hadn't lived here and experienced first-hand what "food" is fed to kids in public schools.
For me, the shots on Oliver's show brought back a lot of childhood memories. I remember rectangular "pizzas", most likely cooked by microwave, in bags of thin crinkly plastic film. Sometimes the cheese wouldn't even detach itself from the plastic, leaving a sloppy mess resembling more an item from Ted Bundy's basement than actual food, as my adolescent fingers fumbled with the packaging. Flat-looking hamburgers, luke-warm and tasting of bland gunk and muck with melty cheese and a soggy bun, with a side of french fries or potato puffs, depending on the day. "Breakfasts" of sugary cereals and diabetic danishes. The choice of beverage between the regular milk, and the more-sugar-per-volume-than-coca-cola chocolate milk--whatever the hell happened to water?--or strawberry milk, on rare days. I'm glad my parents threatened to beat me (alright, maybe it wasn't so extreme, but you get the message) if I ever took the flavored milk.
... Actually, looking back now, I don't think any of the "cheese" I mentioned above was actually cheese, as opposed to aerated hydrogenated soy oil. Ditto for the "beef."
I'm not saying the show is perfect, or that I necessarily like Jamie as a whole. The health problem in America is by no means one of just food, but one of lifestyle in general. And personally, I think he takes it a bit too far with the health food evangelism--for example, when he tries to overhaul the menu at a fast food restaurant in L.A., I found myself agreeing with some of the points the owner made about the integrity of the food; fucking around with the ingredients doesn't necessarily make it a "healthier" version of the same food, and his overreliance on yogurt and salads makes me cringe a little on the inside. Jamie also tends to overplay the "peasant" card, with the fake Cockney accent and the over-use of chicken chow mein in the first season (come on, Chinese food is screwed up enough already without your adding to it).
But at the end of the day, is he doing good work? I'd have to say yes. Jamie points out some major stupidity, such as the decision of one school board that it is a bad idea to remove flavored milk from school menus because, in a study funded by a milk processing group, it correlated with a 35% decrease in overall milk consumption--the exact kind of stark raving bureaucratic idiocy that I abhor. He does have a tendency to lean towards the dramatic, but none of the stuff on his show is outright bull, and he hits on all the important points (the overabundance of sugar and chemical processing, especially), so I do rather think it's worth a watch to anyone who cares. Hell, the dramatic flair is probably a good thing; if I had more activist in me, this show would probably have stirred me into a fiery ball of lobbyist energy, whose fury like hell hath no. As it stands, I just nod knowingly (having gone through the same school food bullshit myself) and hate people a little more on the inside.
Trussing Chickens 101

Trussing a chicken isn't really a "vital" skill per se. But if you spend any time at all around chickens, you'll have to square with the task some day. This applies especially to anyone who claims to know anything about food; say you're anything more than a beginner cook and that you don't know how to tie up a chicken, and people will laugh you right out of the kitchen. In fact, during one of his first jobs Thomas Keller himself had a knife thrown at him by a rather irate chef when he revealed he, despite claims of being a professional cook, could not truss a chicken.
The purpose of tying a chicken up like this before roasting is to help it cook more evenly. The goal here is to hold the chicken together, and make it as ball-like as possible. You don't want bits sticking out, you don't want bits moving around, and you definitely don't want bits falling off. This way, all the parts cook evenly and you don't end up having burnt wings and a raw breast, or overcooked drumsticks but thighs that are still bleeding. To that end, I also stuff the chicken with lemon and some herbs; more details on this in another post. The method of trussing I favor accomplishes the above without any complication and fancy ropework. And more importantly, it's extremely easy to take off after the bird is done roasting and you just want to get the bastard carved and plated already.
For an average 4-pound bird you'll need a piece of butcher's twine about 3 feet long. Any piece of food-safe (i.e., won't melt or burst into flame in the oven... Cotton is probably a good idea) thin twine will work. Don't bother taking out a ruler; for most people, this is the distance from the middle of the chest to the tip of the fingers as they hold their arms out to the side. Use a bit more to be safe. Lay the chicken down with the breast side up. If you're unfamiliar with which part is the breast, consult your nearest chicken manual.

Tuck the wings under, like so. Feel free to use a bit of force as necessary; the joints are more flexible than you might think.
The first thing you'll notice is that the wings are extended out to the side. In the oven, this would leave them very exposed to the hot air, leading them to overcook. To remedy this, the best way is to tuck them under the breast. This brings it close to the body, and makes the rate at which it cooks closer to the rate at which the breast cooks. It's not imperative to tuck them in picture-perfect here; just accomplish the main goal. Also don't be afraid to force it a bit; the joints are stronger than you may think, and the flaps of skin are very easily moved. The worst you'll end up with is a dislocated wing, and let's be honest here: nobody's going to notice anyway.
Next, point the chicken with its neck away from you. Bring your twine under the breast from the front, then back towards you. Tie an overhand knot, above the tailbone. Some people like wrapping up the tail a bit here but I think that's overkill. Bring the twine above the drumsticks, and tie another overhand knot, getting it as tight as possible; again, you want to make the chicken as ball-like as possible, with as few bits sticking out as possible. Tie it off with a second overhand knot.

Make sure the twine is between the breasts and the wings, the ends of twine you are holding are roughly equal.

Another overhand knot. Pull it as tight as you can, and then finish it off with another knot to secure. Seriously, the tighter here the better. (Also what he said.)
And now you have a bird, all trussed up and ready to pop into the oven.
Savenor’s
At first glance, Savenor's is a small market tucked away in Cambridge. From the outside, it looks like the average local grocer, a mom-and-pop version of Whole Foods. But (call the cliche police) it's much more than that.
I only wandered in on rumors from a friend that there was alligator (yes, alligator) meat for sale there, along with a number of other exotic things. The first time I went, I was not disappointed--I saw duck (something that is conspicuously absent from a lot of western supermarkets I visit, for no reason), venison, some good cuts of beef, and... Wait for it... A lion steak. Unfortunately, it was $42 for the size of an average New York sirloin, so I could not afford it at the time. And to be perfectly frank, I spent 10 seconds wondering whether hunting selling lion meat is legal, and what the packing/storage/etc standards were for it, before telling myself to stop being such a wuss. As it turned out, I didn't have the cash, and so had to pass on lion steak with mashed potatoes for dinner. I did return recently to Savenor's; unfortunately, the lion steak was not there this time, but there were a variety of exotic meats I did not catch before, including patties made from yak and elk, and the usual suspects of duck, beef, deer, etc.
Of course, the novelty of the items there is not the only attraction of the store. They have a pretty good (from what I've seen) produce section, with the usual western vegetables and herbs: bell peppers, basil, thyme, celery, potatoes, onions, etc etc. They also had a more interesting selection of mushrooms than you would find at other markets, including (and I walked home with a bag of these on my last trip) morels. Somehow, I've only managed to find morels in Whole Foods just once, years ago; I've never seen anything more interesting than old chanterelles since, but that's a story for another time. Savenor's also has foie gras, and a variety of pates and pastes. I particularly like the mousse imperiale (duck) and mousse truffee (chicken liver and truffle); hell, I like them enough to make a special trip to Savenor's just to get some, as I've failed to find anything equivalent at any other market I've been to. I've tried the duck bacon and maple-smoked bacon that they carry as well but, call me pedestrian, I wasn't really a fan.
Of course, the downside of all this (like with most small markets combined with exotic, hard-to-find products), is the price. This place will eat your wallet alive if you attempt to extract a week's worth of groceries from it. As mentioned above, the lion steak was $40 for a portion big enough for an average person. The foie gras (right) is $37; though in all fairness, it is large enough to feed several. But the bottom line is, if you're not watching carefully it's extremely easy to blow a fortune here. For example, my most recent trip ended with a payload of 2 portions of pate, 1 portion of salmon paste, 1 small bag of morels (enough for 1, maybe 1 1/2 meals), and a small block of goat cheese, and the total came to $40. Of course, I was targeting the stuff that was rare and could be found exclusively at Savenor; I have no idea what the prices on their vegetables and such are like, but since even the more common items are advertised as organic and sustainably farmed, I highly doubt you're going to get cheaper prices than the factory-farmed Perdue chicken and altered bell peppers you'll find at the local Stop and Shop. In short, definitely not the sort of place to shop if you're scraping by to feed a family of four. However, if you have an excess of cash coupled with a curious mind and a stomach for the strange, this is a market to add to the list.










Craigie on Main is the latest in my tour of upwards-trending buzz-filled Cambridge restaurants. That being said, it was surprisingly easy to get a reservation; I actually snagged on Wednesday night a spot for 5:30PM two days later on Friday. It did require a credit card with a possible $25 reservation cancellation fee, but the process was not painful at all. The guy who called to confirm was named Craig; yes, I was tempted to ask him if he was on the Main, and no I did not.




